<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Civil Partnership Bill Debate begins December 3rd</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mamanpoulet.com/civil-partnership-bill-debate-begins-december-3rd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mamanpoulet.com/civil-partnership-bill-debate-begins-december-3rd/</link>
	<description>Clucking away crookedly through media, politics and life.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 10:27:01 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: But what about the straights? &#124; Stephen Spillane</title>
		<link>http://www.mamanpoulet.com/civil-partnership-bill-debate-begins-december-3rd/comment-page-1/#comment-140792</link>
		<dc:creator>But what about the straights? &#124; Stephen Spillane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mamanpoulet.com/?p=2525#comment-140792</guid>
		<description>[...] Civil Partnership Bill Debate begins December 3rd (mamanpoulet.com) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Civil Partnership Bill Debate begins December 3rd (mamanpoulet.com) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.mamanpoulet.com/civil-partnership-bill-debate-begins-december-3rd/comment-page-1/#comment-131205</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 09:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mamanpoulet.com/?p=2525#comment-131205</guid>
		<description>Scrap civil marriage altogether. The state has no business marrying anyone, that&#039;s for Churches to do. The benefit of civil partnership is that it is a contract like any other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scrap civil marriage altogether. The state has no business marrying anyone, that&#8217;s for Churches to do. The benefit of civil partnership is that it is a contract like any other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rory</title>
		<link>http://www.mamanpoulet.com/civil-partnership-bill-debate-begins-december-3rd/comment-page-1/#comment-131003</link>
		<dc:creator>Rory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 09:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mamanpoulet.com/?p=2525#comment-131003</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t the Dáil on limited duties when the strike is on? Will that affect the debate, and hence passage of the bill?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t the Dáil on limited duties when the strike is on? Will that affect the debate, and hence passage of the bill?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SeanR</title>
		<link>http://www.mamanpoulet.com/civil-partnership-bill-debate-begins-december-3rd/comment-page-1/#comment-130814</link>
		<dc:creator>SeanR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 09:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mamanpoulet.com/?p=2525#comment-130814</guid>
		<description>Heeeeyyyyy [slo- mo realisation]  .... isn&#039;t this the day of the next planned national strike?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heeeeyyyyy [slo- mo realisation]  &#8230;. isn&#8217;t this the day of the next planned national strike?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SeanR</title>
		<link>http://www.mamanpoulet.com/civil-partnership-bill-debate-begins-december-3rd/comment-page-1/#comment-130813</link>
		<dc:creator>SeanR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 09:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mamanpoulet.com/?p=2525#comment-130813</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the tip on that! Good news everybody. 

While the civil marriage people have merit of course, I would envisage civil marriage coming once those opposed
/ambivalent to civil partnership begin to see that heterosexual marriage isn&#039;t threatened (following the experiences of Netherlands and Sweden if memory serves). 

Converse to the stance of those opposed to us, there may be a whole new life given to marriage and family... don&#039;t the anti-gay marriage crews get that? We&#039;ll do more for &#039;wedded bliss&#039; than they ever could!

Pragmatically, the need for some sort of recognition for same-sex couples should be brought in as soon as ... perhaps it is wisest now to ensure the Civil Partnership Bill includes as much &#039;bang of our buck&#039; as possible, esp re children, tax, pensions, and welfare.

I&#039;ll be watching the proceedings live on the Doyle-cam thingy...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the tip on that! Good news everybody. </p>
<p>While the civil marriage people have merit of course, I would envisage civil marriage coming once those opposed<br />
/ambivalent to civil partnership begin to see that heterosexual marriage isn&#8217;t threatened (following the experiences of Netherlands and Sweden if memory serves). </p>
<p>Converse to the stance of those opposed to us, there may be a whole new life given to marriage and family&#8230; don&#8217;t the anti-gay marriage crews get that? We&#8217;ll do more for &#8216;wedded bliss&#8217; than they ever could!</p>
<p>Pragmatically, the need for some sort of recognition for same-sex couples should be brought in as soon as &#8230; perhaps it is wisest now to ensure the Civil Partnership Bill includes as much &#8216;bang of our buck&#8217; as possible, esp re children, tax, pensions, and welfare.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be watching the proceedings live on the Doyle-cam thingy&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
