<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: European Commission tells UK to change Equality Law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mamanpoulet.com/european-commission-tells-uk-to-change-equality-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mamanpoulet.com/european-commission-tells-uk-to-change-equality-law/</link>
	<description>Clucking away crookedly through media, politics and life.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:53:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maman Poulet</title>
		<link>http://www.mamanpoulet.com/european-commission-tells-uk-to-change-equality-law/comment-page-1/#comment-130127</link>
		<dc:creator>Maman Poulet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mamanpoulet.com/?p=2492#comment-130127</guid>
		<description>Thanks for that Ian - will put link to this comment in the post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for that Ian &#8211; will put link to this comment in the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.mamanpoulet.com/european-commission-tells-uk-to-change-equality-law/comment-page-1/#comment-130032</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mamanpoulet.com/?p=2492#comment-130032</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This story may or may not be relevant</p>
<p>Irish Examiner</p>
<p>Thursday 8 May 2008</p>
<p>Religious bodies win right to hire based on ethos</p>
<p>Schools and hospitals owned by religious bodies can fire or refuse to hire people if they believe they do not coincide with their ethos, the European Commission has confirmed.</p>
<p>Under Irish legislation, religious bodies of any creed can discriminate against employees on the basis of their religion or behaviour.</p>
<p>The teachersâ€™ unions and the Irish Congress of Trade Unions (ICTU) have long objected to this and have demanded the Government drop it from legislation, saying religious bodies are well protected.</p>
<p>Unions had hoped that the commission warning in January that it was not compatible with EU anti-discrimination legislation would lead to a change in the law.</p>
<p>But the commission has dropped its objection saying it was satisfied with government assurances that the grounds were not too broad.</p>
<p>The Irish National Teachersâ€™ Organisation said it was surprised at the commissionâ€™s decision, as many of their members felt threatened by the law, including separated, gay and lesbian teachers, who fear they risk being sacked.</p>
<p>John Carr, general secretary of the INTO, said some 95% of all primary schools in the state could use this provision in the act since religious bodies own them.</p>
<p>ICTU equality officer David Joyce said they were very disappointed. They would continue to try to change the legislation, â€œbut the commission backing down does not helpâ€?, he said.</p>
<p>Mr Joyce wondered if it had anything to do with the Lisbon Treaty referendum following the Commission President JosÃ© Manuel Barrosoâ€™s indication during his Dublin visit that the threatened action would be dropped.</p>
<p>The commission accepted that it could be necessary to insist that a teacher or hospital professional should not undermine the religious ethos of the school or hospital or other institution employing them.</p>
<p>However neither the commission nor the Government have defined what â€œethosâ€? means legally or what amounts to â€œunderminingâ€?.</p>
<p>The commission has yet to decide whether Irelandâ€™s discrimination/ employment legislation is in line with what they agreed to implement at EU level on a number of areas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.mamanpoulet.com/european-commission-tells-uk-to-change-equality-law/comment-page-1/#comment-130020</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mamanpoulet.com/?p=2492#comment-130020</guid>
		<description>I suspect Stephen is right - something happened about a year or two ago - the commission more or less agreed something like Irelands section 37 was ok or something like that will have to do some searching as a quick search can&#039;t find it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect Stephen is right &#8211; something happened about a year or two ago &#8211; the commission more or less agreed something like Irelands section 37 was ok or something like that will have to do some searching as a quick search can&#8217;t find it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.mamanpoulet.com/european-commission-tells-uk-to-change-equality-law/comment-page-1/#comment-129822</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mamanpoulet.com/?p=2492#comment-129822</guid>
		<description>did we get an opt-out or a derogation from the directive? I have a feeling its ok and wouldnt be struck down by ECJ.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>did we get an opt-out or a derogation from the directive? I have a feeling its ok and wouldnt be struck down by ECJ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

