Maman Poulet | Clucking away crookedly through media, politics and life

Catholic Communications Office complaint to RTE

May 22nd, 2010 · Irish Media, Religion

There was a bit of toing and froing between RTE and the Catholic Communications Office this week over a report on PrimeTime last Tuesday on the problems facing the Catholic Church and on the decision by Cardinal Sean Brady to stay in office.

The report featured a number of inaccuracies that I spotted myself on the night, however the Catholic Communications Office were not just angry about the inaccuracies but the tone and attitude of the piece.  In homage to the Archbishop McQuaid school of complaints there were mentions of ‘excessive darkness’ in the imagery.

Thanks to my friends in the church (!) for a copy of the correspondence between the Communication Office and Ken O’Shea, RTE’s Current Affairs Editor,  which was sent out to the Cardinal, Bishops and priests throughout the country.

RTE did make a clarification on their show on Thursday night regarding Bishop Willie Walsh’s resignation and the incorrect picture of Bishop Drennan being shown – nothing else was mentioned though.   (Anyone else think that Bishop Willie Walsh is very happy to be retiring all the same?)

Dear Ken,

I am writing to you in relation to mistakes which were made in the broadcast of Tuesday’s (18 May) ‘Primetime’ concerning the Catholic Church.  I ask that tonight’s programme correct these mistakes (see points below) please.

In advance of your programme, the Catholic Communications Office sent in a reply at 13.22 on Tuesday 18 May to a media request from Rita O’Reilly of Primetime which sought to determine how many bishops had resigned since the publication of the Ryan and Murphy Reports and on what grounds.

While the CCO press release announcing Bishop Willie Walsh’s resignation did not specify the reason for his resignation, our email response to the Primetime query for information did explicitly state “age� as the reason for Bishop Walsh’s resignation as it said “… below is the list of resignations as discussed (I have listed the official announcements in date order).  The first two relate to those granted on grounds of age, Bishops Willie Walsh and Joseph Duffy.�

This is at variance to your reply to a complaint by Fr Seamus Gardiner concerning the same broadcast where you stated that “the [Primetime] reporter asked the Catholic Communications Office to supply us with a list and we told them we would be relying on the factual position as put to us by them. The script was based on what they emailed us and told us and it is as follows: …�

Thus Primetime has made a number of serious mistakes and partial editorial decisions in its broadcast and in your email to Fr Gardiner:

  • The programme script clearly infers that Bishop Willie Walsh had to resign due to a failure of accountability, in other words for reasons not related to age grounds.  This is both factually incorrect and grossly misleading.  Quote from the programme:

“Heads have rolled since the publication of the Ryan and then the Murphy Reports.  Eight Irish bishops have offered to resign. So far the Pope has accepted six: the resignations of the Bishop of Limerick, Donal Murray; the Bishop of Cloyne, John Magee; the Bishop of Kildare & Leighlin, James Moriarty; today Willie Walsh, the Bishop of Killaloe.  Pope Benedict has also accepted that two other Bishops have resigned on age grounds: Joseph Duffy, Bishop of Clogher and Francis Lagan, Auxiliary Bishop of Derry.�

  • Whilst Primetime has since corrected – in text form on its website – that Bishop Willie Walsh resigned due to age grounds, there remains a much more serious correction to be made, based on the context of the programme, namely to vindicate Bishop Willie Walsh’s good name in relation to safeguarding children.   Primetime should broadcast this clarification this evening concerning the false impression given by the programme for Bishop Walsh’s resignation, and not in the form of a text correction on its website.
  • Your point in your email to Fr Gardiner that “It can’t be said that Willie Walsh’s resignation was accepted on age grounds because it’s simply not the caseâ€? – and which you support by an “exampleâ€? – is based on an incorrect mathematical calculation.  Completing one’s 75th year and reaching 75 years of age are actually two ways of describing the same age.  Bishop Walsh, as with Bishops Duffy and Lagan, has completed his 75th year.  It is wrong to assert that “In fact, although Willie Walsh reached 75 in January, the relevant Canon Law, Canon 401.1 states that a Bishop “who has completed his 75th year of ageâ€? has to offer his resignation to the Pope, not a bishop who has just started his 75th year of age.â€?  Bishop Walsh started his 76th year of age from January 2010!
  • The programme named Bishop Raymond Field who has tendered his resignation but pictured Bishop Martin Drennan instead who has not tendered his resignation.
  • The video film introduction was excessively dark in imagery.
  • The animated and exaggerated ‘mitres’ superimposed on the head and shoulder photographs of bishops were clearly meant to ridicule and were offensive to Catholics.

I look forward to you correcting these serious mistakes and impressions in tonight’s programme.

Regards

MARTIN LONG

Director

Catholic Communications Office

Irish Bishops’ Conference

Columba Centre

St Patrick’s College

Maynooth

Co Kildare

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Share

» 4 CommentsTags:·····

Donegal Politicians do Rocky Impressions

May 21st, 2010 · Irish Politics

Tonight in Letterkenny Niall Blaney TD, Cllr Barry O’Neill (FG) and Cllr Frank McBrearty (Labour) took to the boxing ring as part of a Charity White Collar Boxing Competition. Both Niall Blaney and Barry O’Neill lost their fights, but Frank McBrearty took to the ring and won.

Thanks to Damien Blake for the picture and reports!

Suggestions for the next constituency and entrants into the ring?

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Share

» 1 CommentTags:····

Ladies and Gentlemen… Your Opposition

May 21st, 2010 · Irish Politics, Social Media

Fine Gael have this week launched a new campaign titled NewEra, with accompanying website outlining their plans for jobs, broadband, energy and water policies.

The website has videos from Enda Kenny, Simon Coveney and Leo Varadkar talking about these plans (George Lee look at what you are missing!)

And then there is this – Whack – a – Dodo – an invitation to commit acts of violence via a video game on members of the government and errant bankers.  I was stunned at first by the thoughts of hammering Mary Coughlan – encouraging us to hit a woman? No matter how much you think the Tanaiste is incompetent and a liability why would the party who wishes to be in government and the party of law and order wish website visitors to hit her and other members of Fianna Fáíl?

Fine Gael’s history of website design and engagement with social media has been one long FAIL – they are consistent at something at least.  They patronise their electorate and offend many and tell nobody nothing new about what they intend to do or make anyone want to vote for them.  As for the design? I’ll leave that post-mortem to the techies.

PS. Did they get the Russians in again to design it? Or is it the staff in FG who can’t check the copy? See this

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Share

» 7 CommentsTags:····

State funding of political parties – lots of money for the lads?

May 21st, 2010 · Irish Politics

The Standards in Public Office Commission this week released a report into the state funding of political parties.

The purpose of the state funding is laid out in the Electoral Act 1997

” … the general conduct and management of the party’s affairs and the lawful pursuit by it of any of its objectives and, without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing, any or all of the following purposes, namely –

(1) the general administration of the party,

(2) research, education and training,

(3) policy formulation, and

(4) the co-ordination of the activities of the branches and members of the party.”

The report contains an analysis of the way in which each party reported they spent the funds awarded to them.  The Commission ascertained the proportion of funds (£5.91m)  spent on administration, research, policy work and  promoting the participation of women and young people.

Immediately you will notice the minuscule amount of funding used by Fianna Fáil,  Fine Gael and the Green Party on the participation of women.  Now they may say they use other funds for these measures but surely they should be using funds of the state on these matters and be shown to be doing so?

In total only €123,232 of the €5.91 million was spent on the promotion of participation by women, with €208, 523 spent on Youth Participation.  The 2009 report from the Joint Committee on Justice, Equality and Women’s Rights does recommend more funding to be spent encouraging the participation of women in politics.  14% of TD’s are female and it does not look like the situation will improve for the two biggest parties in the land with the amounts of funding they are dedicating to the area.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Share

» 5 CommentsTags:·····

Irish Government issue statement on Malawi Sentences

May 20th, 2010 · Uncategorized

There has been wide international condemnation of the 14 year hard labour jail sentences for Tiwonge Chimbalanga and Steven Monjeza in Malawi today. The two men were found guilty of indecency for celebrating their relationship in public with an engagement party.

On trying to find out more about Ireland’s relationship with Malawi I was surprised (and impressed) to note that the Minister for State with responsibility for  Overseas Development at the Department of Foreign Affairs, Peter Power, has released a statement on the matter.

Minister of State for Overseas Development, Peter Power, TD today made the following statement in relation to the sentencing of Mr Tiwonge Chimbalanga and Mr Steven Monjeza in Malawi:

“I have been following this case very closely through our Embassy in Malawi, and, along with our EU partners, have regularly emphasised to the authorities our serious concern about this case.

“Now that the two men have been sentenced, we are working with our partners for a strong EU response.  On Ireland’s part, as friends and partners of Malawi, which is one of the priority countries for our bilateral assistance, I want to emphasise our very serious concern and disappointment at the severe sentence imposed on the two men on the basis of their sexual orientation.

“The sentence is entirely disproportionate and against international human rights principles.  With our EU partners, we are calling on the Government of Malawi to fulfil its commitments to the protection of the human rights of all individuals, irrespective of their sexual orientation�.

That is a swift and strong reaction by previous Irish standards though I do wonder what type of sentence would be proportionate – the sentence and charges are wrong.  Is there more the Minister can do and what can we do to ensure that he follows through?

You could contact him online here and thank him for his actions so far and ask him to continue?

Share

» 5 CommentsTags: