Maman Poulet | Clucking away crookedly through media, politics and life

Handbags over Civil Partnership and Government Collapse

January 30th, 2011 · General Election 2011, Green Party, Irish Politics, LGBT, Same Sex Partnerships

There is going to be a lot of revisionism and distorting of the facts in the next four weeks and I am sure we’ll be catching and factchecing a lot of claims along the way.  Some of it is off before the campaign has begun, no surprise there!

On Friday Minister for Finance, Brian Lenihan, was speaking on the Finance Bill which was before the Seanad. He explained the matter of the non inclusion of measures pertaining to Civil Partnership in the bill thus

The Bill embodies the various budgetary measures but it also contains other provisions, as finance Bills necessarily do. However, it does not include all the matters which would have been contained in the original Finance Bill. Indeed, the question of civil partnership, which was agitated here during the year as well, arose on the Finance Bill because the solemnisation of civil partnerships begins from 1 April this year and it would have been desirable to have had a finance Bill clarifying the tax status of these relationships in advance of that. Work was far advanced in my Department on preparing the necessary amendments which involved 150 statutory provisions to give effect to that. However, as it happens, it will not be possible in the limited time available to us to table those amendments and while I am sure some Senators will breathe a sigh of relief that the matter will not be freshly agitated in Seanad Éireann, it seems undesirable with the status now coming into force on 1 April and that those who contract accordingly do not have clarity about their tax status.

Senator Mary M. White: We swept it through the Seanad.

Deputy Brian Lenihan: The different parties can deal with that. It was extraordinary that the Green Party, which made such an effort at pushing the question, could not find it in its heart to give the Government another week or two to arrange for that. These are matters of political consideration. They are not matters relating to the Finance Bill.

Didn’t the Green Party withdraw from government because of the shenanigans that was Cowen trying to replace 6 ministers in his cabinet 2 months before an election was due to take place and they had enough? Also after the discussions between all parties to arrange the debate on the Finance Bill Joan Burton reported that the minister said that the sections on the bill would not be ready for another month. And of course the Minister’s department had 6 months to get the legislation ready!

I’m not a defender of the Green Party but I called electioneering spoofery when I heard this from Lenihan. The Greens were not so happy either as you might imagine given that they are claiming credit for the legislation.

Dan Boyle responded in the debate

I am disappointed with one thing the Minister said in respect of the Civil Partnership and Certain Rights and Obligations of Cohabitants Act 2010. He intimated that if the Green Party had given this Government another two to three weeks of artificial life, the measures in respect of that Act would have been brought into the Bill. I understand that at the meeting of all party spokespersons a few days ago, it was commonly accepted that the 150 amendments relating to the Act can be introduced in the finance (No.2) Bill, which can be passed before 1 April. I would like to see every political party commit to that. I welcome the fact that the Minister said he was surprised at the Green Party being seen in this position as the Green Party had pushed most strongly for the civil partnership legislation. This is something I did not hear from the relevant Minister at the time when he was finishing the debate on the Civil Partnership and Certain Rights and Obligations of Cohabitants Act 2010.

Later the deputy leader of the Green Party, Mary White, issued a statement also rejecting the ministers assertions and had a dig at Dermot Ahern while she was at it.

“For Minister Lenihan to imply that it is our fault that the taxation provisions on civil partnership will have to be brought in after the election is a complete mischaracterisation of the situation,” she added.

“Minister Lenihan knows that as soon as the Green Party entered government, we immediately began engagement with the Department of Justice, of which he was then Minister, to progress the issue of Civil Partnership.

“We have always felt that the bill could have been progressed much more quickly, but that there was a reluctance in the Department of Justice, particularly after Minister Lenihan left, to prioritise the legislation,”

There you go gays, do you feel special? Not sure if the queers will be held up as a rowing matter again in the election campaign but it will be 4 weeks long so you never know.

The Green Party by the way have sent copy of their advertisement for the civil partnership edition of GCN as further proof of their committment.

More anon on the various election manifestos pertaining to equality as they are launched.

Share

» 4 CommentsTags:····

Candidate Video #11 – Ciaran Cannon

January 30th, 2011 · Elections, General Election 2011, Irish Politics

Fine Gaelers are in overdrive on the video front, I assume that we’ll see lots of candidate videos from other parties in the weeks to come.

Some of these videos are great showreels for TV presenter jobs in case they don’t get elected! Today we start with Senator Ciaran Cannon, ex PD leader who joined FG and is running in Galway East. Speaking literally to us from the fields of Athenry.

Share

Comments Off on Candidate Video #11 – Ciaran CannonTags:···

Video blogging the campaign – Paschal Donohue

January 29th, 2011 · Elections, General Election 2011, Irish Politics, Social Media

Senator Paschal Donohue is by now an old hand at this social media stuff having blogged his bye-election run in Dublin Central in 2009 and to his credit continuing to blog and engage online throughout the past eighteen months. He’s trying video blogging now (His youtube channel if you want to keep an eye on him!)

Share

Comments Off on Video blogging the campaign – Paschal DonohueTags:···

Candidate Video #9 John McGuirk

January 29th, 2011 · Elections, General Election 2011, Irish Politics

John McGuirk formerly Fine Gael, formerly Libertas, fomerly National Forum and sometime commenter on Maman Poulet.  Now an independent candidate for Cavan Monaghan and by the sounds of it he’s  aligned to the Independent Alliance for Change (aka Profit Before People) He’s ‘no oil painting’, I nearly needed a tissue!  Not sure where the website is? Update: It’s up!

Share

» 3 CommentsTags:···

Pravda in Mount Street

January 28th, 2011 · Elections, General Election 2011, Irish Politics, Social Media

I’ve been keeping a list of twitter accounts established by candidates in the General Election. It’s interesting to watch campaigns take shape and candidates find their feet online. Some use it to react to voters and national election/political issues, others talk about the feelings/opinions of voters that they are experiencing on the canvass.

Many FG TD’s and candidates have established accounts in the last ten days. Fine Gael HQ themselves have an account – @FineGaelToday.

This afternoon that account tweeted a statement about Enda Kenny’s visit to Brussels this evening.

It was quickly deleted – that’s a retweet that I caught and can’t be deleted by the original sender.  ‘Mr. Barroso recognises Fine Gael is the next party of Government’.  Confident eh?

Shortly afterwards (14.15) a stream of repetitive tweets came from a number of TD’s at the same time. Unfortunately the tweets would not be read by many – ie.  A tweet coming from Brian Hayes which starts @EndaKennyTD means that only those subscribed to Enda Kenny’s account would be able to see it. Maybe it was a misguided attempt to get Enda Kenny trending on twitter. Sigh.

It’s very clear that these tweets were centrally sent from someone using tweetdeck.

Someone obviously realised the lack of impact of this initial tweet from multiple TD’s so the exercise was repeated at about 5pm  after Enda met with Mr. Barrosso. Instantly the same tweet came from candidates accounts – all using tweetdeck to do so.

Candidates who hand over control of their personal accounts to someone else are silly, parties who take control of their candidates accounts give the impression of a)having no faith in their candidates or b) having no clue or c)complete paranoia of message control.

There’s no problem with candidates sending that message themselves throughout the day – repeating the message of the day with their own twist on it maybe – in their own voice. I saw that many of the Labour candidates for example tweeting the 50 days message ten days ago with some putting their own touch on it and it was clear that they were doing it themselves.

Yesterday morning I saw Enda Kenny give a speech about trust at  Edelman’s launch of their Trust Barometer research. Ironically that speech centred on the siege of Leningrad.

The use of social media in elections is about engaging with electorate and creating trust. If candidates can’t be trusted to operate their own twitter accounts and speak their own mind how can we trust them in government?

Share

» 4 CommentsTags:···