More on the Religious Freedom optout
Posted by Maman Poulet on 29 Nov 2009 at 05:40 pm | Tagged as: Irish Politics, Religion, Same Sex Partnerships
The Irish Catholic reports (not sure of publication date) that there is growing support for a concientious objector or ‘religious freedom’ amendment to the Civil Partnership Bill. (h/t Ian)
Amongst the TD’s quoted as being supportive are Mattie McGrath (FF – Tipperary South) and Lucinda Creighton (FG Dublin South East)
Irish Catholic editor (and former Vatican Radio staffer) Michael Kelly writes that Creighton supports such an amendment and that there are several other FG TD’s in support of it. There are lots of lesbians and gay men living and voting in Dublin South East (Ranelagh, Rathmines, Donnybrook, etc.) and you may feel the urge to respectfully contact Ms. Creighton (lucinda.creighton (@) oireachtas.ie) and tell her that there is no need for such an amendment and that this issue has nothing to do with religion. No amendments have been published yet by the way. We’ll have to wait for the second stage to proceed on Thursday.
Labour are against including an amendment protecting registrars but say
”In general, the Labour Party would not support any measure that requires a religious organisation to be involved in any activity that is in conflict with its ethical position.”
Eh? It’s Civil Partnership. However I’m sure they are referring to the church hall committee ruse. Now if that parish hall has been in receipt of state funds and provides those facilities for groups that have nothing to do with religion I don’t see how it should be permitted to stop people using it for celebrations but I don’t think there is going to be massive queues to book the hall for a CP party.
I assumed the Labour Party won’t be supporting any amendment aimed at ‘protecting’ bigotry from an organisation or individual. I’m sure that assumption is correct.
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=87d1e1be-1334-4b31-8345-f533584fec29)
Oh bring on ethics please …
In the light of the report into child abuse this week, the argument for Catholic/ religious/ conscientious objection to civil partnership has died with any moral authority the church had left. These cretins in the Dail who are making ripples (small waves) about this are just so out of touch. Their opinions on morality are about as relevent as Jedward’s well-known thesis on male pattern baldness…
As a straight person I’m curious as to the LGBT community’s attitude to this Bill. I’m all for equality but does this not have a detrimental effect in an attempt to bring equality in that it enshrines a difference into legislation? Or is it seen as a step in the right direction?
[...] If you want an example of the kind of malign influence that Catholicism has had (and continues to have) on the public life of Ireland, here’s one with 100% extra free (both via Maman Poulet): [...]
[...] I came across crazy Christians, Renew, thanks to recent posts on MamanPoulet (here and here). MP has also been writing about the religious fundies lobbying for a religious “opt-out” to the Civil Partnership Bill here. [...]
[...] around the Bill here. Of particular interest is discussion of the addition of a so-called ‘religious freedom optout‘ to the bill. Padraig has blogged on that issue here. Maman Poulet carries details of a [...]
[...] Wondering if the discussions in Fine Gael about the florist cop out amendment are getting a bit too much for her? I’m sure she’ll be back in the new year with her friends in the Iona Institute propping her up. (Lucinda doesn’t really like the bill and wants some sort of protection for those who don’t like gays much either.) [...]
Well said, Maman Poulet. Where does the idea of a civil servant being allowed to decline to do his or her civil duty because of a religious scruple end? Will Catholic public librarians be allowed to decide on religious grounds which books they will and won’t lend? The principle defended here by Creighton et al suggests they should be allowed to do just that.
[...] made about private service and goods providers as well (marvellously covered by Suzy Byrne here and here) so I will briefly address that matter [...]